Which of the following is NOT a valid monument in a legal description?

In legal descriptions of property, monuments are physical markers used to identify property boundaries. They can be natural features or man-made constructions that clearly define the limits of a parcel of land.

A fence line serves as a physical and visible boundary marker that is commonly used in property descriptions to indicate where one property ends and another begins. Although it may seem less permanent than other options, it is still a valid monument as it directly marks a boundary.

A tree is often used as a landmark in legal descriptions, particularly in rural areas. Trees can serve as natural markers that have been recognized for legal purposes, especially if they are considered substantial and longstanding.

Similarly, a large rock can also serve as a valid monument. It is a natural feature that can be distinctly identified and marked as part of a property boundary.

A section corner, however, is an established point created by surveyors that marks the intersection of imaginary lines used in the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). It is a high level of precision and is a legally recognized location in property descriptions.

Therefore, the notion that a fence line is not a valid monument contrasts with the accepted practice of using man-made features as boundary markers. This illustrates the importance of understanding the role of various types of physical markers